Monday, January 16, 2012

OBAMA - RUNNING FROM HIS RECORD, BUT HE WON'T BE ABLE TO HIDE FROM IT

Please Sign up as a Subcriber to my Email List in the form on the right of the page and Check Out all the links to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing at the end of the article.

Always desire to learn something useful.
~Sophocles


Always do your best. What you plant now, you will harvest later.
~Og Mandino


Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you.
~Thomas Jefferson




OBAMA - RUNNING FROM HIS RECORD, BUT HE WON'T BE ABLE TO HIDE FROM IT.

In a "60 Minutes" interview, Mr. Obama offered what might be insight into his 2012 presidential election strategy. It takes some decoding, but his underlying strategic goals emerge in what he says, "The question next year is going to be — and then this is how a democracy is supposed to work — do they see a more compelling vision coming out from the other side? Do they think that cutting taxes further, including on the wealthy, cutting taxes on corporations, of gutting regulations — do we think that that is going to be somehow more successful? And if the American people think that that’s a recipe for success and a majority are persuaded by that, then I’m going to lose."

It appears he wants the election to be a referendum on the Republican candidates and their political philosophy. By posing the key question as whether the GOP remedy for the economy will be "somehow more successful," he makes it clear that he wants this contest to be about the Republican Party proposals. The proposals from Newt Gingrich, do however hold promise; I’ve seen them work twice in my lifetime.

President Obama hopes he can fool the American People and appear to be running as a non-incumbent, abandoning all but a pro forma defense of his record and instead running as he would were there an open seat, thus pretending it’s the 2008 election again. He wants it to be the 2008 election all over again, where he is free to float ideas without taking any responsibility for his performance in office or that of the economy on his watch. Only this time, unlike his brief, insignificant, and often, "missing-in-action" tenure in the Illinois Legislature and the U.S. Senate, there is a record of his performance this go around – a record and legacy of failure.

I get the impression that he is determined to make the presidential election a contest between two policy alternatives, deliberately omitting the issue of competence, or more so, his incompetence. He wants all the votes that his point of view will permit him to garner despite his obvious incompetence in implementing it. Obama seems to want to turn the election into a referendum on policy, almost as if it were an issue on the ballot rather than a president seeking reelection. While this preference is understandable, given his dismal record, the Republican Party (click for link) cannot let him get away with it. He’s like an incompetent employee hoping to save his job by advocating a broad-based shift in his corporation’s philosophy in the hopes that his bosses will ignore his own poor performance. Anyone with a pulse and a functioning brain could not have overlooked poor performance. I don’t believe that he can convince the majority of Americans the he deserves another term or that it would in any way benefit ‘everyday’, American People.



The key question Republican Candidates must pose to the president: "What are you planning to do in the next four years to get the economy moving that you have not tried and failed with during your first term, especially during that portion of the term when you had total control of Congress and still couldn’t fix the economy?"

Of course, the other part of Obama’s presidential election strategy will be a slash-and-burn approach to attacking his opponent. Using the cooperation of the "bought-and-paid-for" media, he will throw any accusation that comes to mind against his Republican Party opponent in the hope that enough sticks to help him win. But in this essentially negative approach to the campaign, he is laboring under the handicap that the aspiring Republican Candidates will have been thoroughly vetted during the primaries. Any negatives that exist will have been aired so extensively that they will pack little punch in the fall. In this respect, the primary contest is serving to inoculate the potential Republican Candidates by raising all the negatives and exhausting them before the fall presidential election even starts.

As for the rest of Mr. Obama’s strategy — it won’t work. Nobody is going to forget the current state of the economy or fail to remember how ineffective the stimulus program was at doing anything other than digging us deeper into self-destructive debt. The fact is that an incumbent president is up for reelection and there is more than a clash of philosophies at issue. There will be two men, and one of them, Barack Hussein Obama, is a demonstrated failure(click for video).

I would suggest, in opposition to Obama and his socialist agenda, that Americans not accept the media maneuvers to decieve the public and their attempts to, in effect, select Mitt "Rmoney" as the Republican Nominee and pick a strong, conservative to lead our country out of the current mess and into a properous future; that would be Newt Gingrich (click for link).

Mike Emory

Mitt Romney is a Massachusetts Moderate with progressive views. Newt is a Reagan Conservative with a track record to prove it.

I wish you success in your quest to live your life on your terms.

Your Comments Are Welcomed in the Comment Box Provided at the End of the Post

Other places to follow and connect with
Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Emory-Affiliated-Marketing/105097862855281?v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503082793

http://affiliatehotspot.blogspot.com/

http://nutri-heal-affiliate.blogspot.com/


http://twitter.com/@ClickFinder

http://twitter.com/@MichaelDEmory

http://americangovernment.com/

http://americangovernment.com/?page_id=21

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Meet The Real Mitt - "Moderate Mitt"


Legacy Of Failure (point & click)
Please Sign up as a Subcriber to my Email List in the form on the right of the page and Check Out all the links to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing at the end of the article.

DO NOT LET THE MEDIA PICK THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
Like Rush Limbaugh said, and I agree, we don't need a flip-flopping, moderate. You might need a moderate if you were grasping for votes in a tight election. But with a strong, conservative, and experienced candidate, we're not going to be grasping for votes in an election against a record as pathetic as Barack Obama's.
WATCH THIS VIDEO
~
http://www.newt.org/news/newt-2012-releases-new-tv-ad-timid-vs-bold ,


During his 1994 campaign for Senate in Massachusetts, Romney disowned any connection to or affinity for Ronald Reagan: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush." (Joe Battenfield, "Conservative Group Yanks Its Support For Mitt," Boston Herald, 10/27/94).

Mitt Romney opposed efforts to elect Republicans
In 1992, Romney voted in the Democratic presidential primary for liberal former Massachusetts Sen. Paul Tsongas, a fact he still proudly touts today. He proclaimed in 1994, "I’m not a partisan politician." (David Broder, "Kennedy Tries To Polish Faded Image," The Washington Post, 10/7/94)
Romney proudly defended donations to Democratic congressional candidates that he made in 1992. He told reporters: ‘I don’t think they’re mortal sins for Republican Party members to make contributions to good people and to their friends, irrespective of their party.’


The 1992 presidential election had consequences: Democrats took simultaneous control of the White House, House of Representatives, and Senate for the first time since 1980, and Bill Clinton and the Democratic Congress would quickly raise taxes in 1993. (Wayne Woodlief, "Romney: Religion No Issue In Senate Race," Boston Herald, 2/3/94).

Just days before the 1994 Congressional mid-term election, Massachusetts Senate candidate Mitt Romney vigorously opposed the Contract with America in his debate with incumbent Senator Ted Kennedy. Romney said the Contract with America, signed by over 350 Republican Candidates for the House of Representatives, was "not a good idea" and "a mistake".

Mitt Romney opposed the Contract with America. (point & click to read the 21st Century, Contract With America)
In his failed 1994 Massachusetts Senate campaign, Mitt Romney vigorously opposed the Contract with America. Running on the Contract as a solemn promise to the American people to accomplish the items of the Contract, Republicans took back the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, and proceeded to cut taxes.


Moreover, he repeatedly has spent much of his own fortune to outspend opponents. While I have no problem with any candidate spending his own money, in our Republic much can be said for the candidate who is able to raise money from the "folks" to run his campaign. It demonstrates support from the grassroots, as opposed to buying support in a presidential election process. I separate the two. Romney contributed over $6 million to his own campaign during the election against Kennedy, a state record at the time. He'll do much the same thing in the 2012 republican presidential election contest.

Even while Governor of Massachusetts he demonstrated his moderate, progressive tendencies much of the time. Romney supported raising various fees by more than $300 million, including those for driver's licenses, marriage licenses, and gun licenses. He increased a special gasoline retailer fee by two cents per gallon. Anytime fees and taxes are raised they impose a hardship on those who can least afford them. Something progressives have no problem with.


Leadership In 2012 (point & click)
 Republican candidates for POTUS have to do everything in their power to demonstrate leadership skills, strength of conviction, ability to raise money, support from grassroots voters, strength of message and its applicability in the world today, resourcefulness, capacity to respond instantaneously when challenged, and an distinctly American spirit. Mitt has failed on all those fronts in both the 2008 election and the 2012 presidential election. In this presidential election, there is one candidate who has demonstrated all of those traits and that's Newt Gingrich. When the mainstream media had Newt's candidacy DOA, Newt proved his resourcefulness and raised money, stayed on message, demonstrated leadership skills, spoke well of all the candidates, remained convicted that the country could do better, and responded instantaneously when challenged.

House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years, and proceeded to cut taxes,
This message was sent to kathryn@newt.org from: Newt 2012 | P.O. Box 550769 | Atlanta, GA 30355
Email Marketing by
Unsubscribe
balance the budget, and reform welfare. (Rod Dreher, "Kennedy Avoids Haymaker In Final Debate With Romney," The Washington Times, 10/28/94; video available here: Senate Debate, October 27, 1994. WCVB-TV (Boston).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jzno_apP1Q)
During his October 27, 1994 senatorial debate against Ted Kennedy, Romney declared "in my view, it is not a good idea to go into a contract, like what was organized by the Republican Party in Washington, laying out a whole series of things that the party says ‘these are the things we are going to do.’ I think that’s a mistake. I think instead that if you want to get something done in Washington, you don’t end up picking teams, with Republicans on one side and Democrats on the other, entering into a contract and saying ‘we’re all gonna do this.’ Then of course, if that works, then the other side feels like a loser. But if they win they feel like winners. I don’t like winners and losers in
Washington, I’d rather say, let’s get together and work together." (Rod Dreher, "Kennedy Avoids Haymaker In Final Debate With Romney," The Washington Times, 10/28/94; video available here: Senate Debate, October 27, 1994. WCVB-TV (Boston).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Jzno_apP1Q)

I wish you success in your quest to live your life on your terms.

Your Comments Are Welcomed in the Comment Box Provided at the End of the Post

Other places to follow and connect with
Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Emory-Affiliated-Marketing/105097862855281?v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503082793

http://affiliatehotspot.blogspot.com/

http://nutri-heal-affiliate.blogspot.com/

http://twitter.com/@ClickFinder


http://americangovernment.com/?page_id=21

http://twitter.com/@MichaelDEmory

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Ensuring America's Survival and Protecting Those who Share our Values

Ensuring America's Survival and Protecting Those who Share our Values

Click Here For Info On Obama's Failed Presidency
Please Sign up as a Subcriber to my Email List in the form on the right of the page and Check Out all the links to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing at the end of the article.

As our enemies have found we can reason like men, so now let us show them we can fight like men also.
~Thomas Jefferson

Believe you can and you're halfway there.
~Theodore Roosevelt

Article Written by: Ralph Hudson

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Are You Serious?
 

Ensuring America's Survival and Protecting Those who Share our Values
In any modern day presidential election foreign policy must necessarily be a very serious component of the debate. In a world filled with serious conflict, both regional and sectarian, the "abiding alternative to tyranny" (a Ronald Reagan reference to America) must recognize its responsibility to survive and to protect others who share our values. While most of the republican candidates in the 2012 presidential election understand this in principle, the practical application of what that means is another matter.

Sun Tzu, the author of The Art of War written sometime between 476–221 BC, said "If ignorant both of your enemy and yourself, you are certain to be in peril." Put another way, to avoid peril, know yourself and know your enemy.

Let's start with knowing ourselves. Reagan's reference to the United States as the "abiding
YEP...He did it. How Pathetic And Foolish Is That?!?
alternative to tyranny" is a good foundation to build upon, assuming we believe it. The common mainstream media reference and the favorite of Rep. Ron Paul, a republican party candidate in the 2008 election and the 2012 presidential election who is actually a libertarian clothed as a republican, would both describe us as the "world's policeman." However, that is a negative and a intentionally poisoned reference. We are not and clearly cannot be the world's policeman. What we can be is a protector of those who share our values. Very different from being a policeman, a protector looks after those who otherwise would be unable to protect or defend themselves.

The other problem with the world's policeman analogy is that it is used to imply that the knee-jerk American response is to use force. While the threat of the use of force and the ability to deliver it is an important piece of a sound foreign policy, a practical protector knows that is the last resort. Sun Tzu put it thus, "For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill." If we want
We Need An American President With American Values
subduction of those who would otherwise threaten America and those who share our values "without fighting," the leader of the free world had better have a good idea about how that is done. That person had better be real diplomat who sees the world for what it is: seriously conflicted. The 2012 presidential election and specifically the republican candidates are no exception in that regard. In fact, the case can be made that this is one of the most important elections in recorded history when it comes to foreign policy issues.

Now, how about knowing our enemy, knowing those who would be a treat to those we wish to protect? Newt Gingrich, a republican candidates for president in the republican presidential election, has argued effectively that we should be candid about our opponents. As a long-time member of the hawkish republican party born out of the Reagan administration's "peace through strength" policy of the 1980's, he understands better than any republican candidates in this presidential primary that such candidness is an indespensible part of defining America. Particularly to our enemy and specifically to our allies.

To be candid is to be free from reservation, disguise, or subterfuge. Frankly, it means to be straightforward. One of the particular difficulties with someone who is uncandid is that one must attempt to read their minds, so to speak. Beating around the bush results in never really knowing their thinking and as a result making it very difficult to understand what motivates them. On the other hand, when one is candid that is never the case. To be candid about our enemies and what motivates us with regard to them and they with regard to us is probably the most important missing ingredient today in the world of foreign policy which has been in recent years driven by political correctness. That is a dangerous element to allow into the debate when there is so much as stake in the world today. There will be no place for political correctness in the coming years and Newt Gingrich is the one republican candidates who fundamentally understands that.

For more information on Newt's solutions, visit
www.newt.org/solutions.
Ralph T. Hudson

Former District Director for

U.S. Congressman Asa Hutchinson (R)

3rd District of Arkansas


I wish you success in your quest to live your life on your terms.

Your Comments Are Welcomed in the Comment Box Provided at the End of the Post

Other places to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing:


http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Emory-Affiliated-Marketing/105097862855281?v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503082793

http://affiliatehotspot.blogspot.com/

http://nutri-heal-affiliate.blogspot.com/

http://twitter.com/@ClickFinder

http://twitter.com/@MichaelDEmory

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Illegal immigration in the United States



Click Here For More Information
Please Sign up as a Subcriber to my Email List in the form on the right of the page and Check Out all the links to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing at the end of the article.




All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.
~John Adams


Article Written by: Ralph Hudson

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Illegal immigration in the United States is a complex and difficult problem that is once again an issue in the 2012 presidential election. This issue has shown a contrast between the republican candidates in the way the issue needs to be resolved. The rule of law is of tantamount importance in America. As a result, most Americans feel strongly that those in this country illegally should be "sent home." Some estimates have that number at 10 or 11 million people. Let's put that number in perspective: If you stood every mother, father, and child who were in this country illegally in one place you would have a group one and a half times the size of the City of New York! That's a lot of people here illegally. In fact, it's a huge number. Nearly an unmanageable number when you think about the "sending them home" piece. However, most Americans would argue that a way needs to be found to do it nonetheless. Before a solution is implemented, that number cannot be allowed to increase; the leak has to be stopped. Something we have heard since the 2008 election.

Click Here For More Information
Which leads us to the border with Mexico. At 1,969 miles, it is a vast and difficult terrain. It spans four U.S. states, six Mexican states, and has over twenty commercial railroad crossings. While the area can mostly be fenced effectively, there are parts that might not lend themselves well to fencing, particularly the railroad crossings. Those areas could be patrolled by unmanned drones with Homeland Security and ICE personnel at the ready to respond to breeches, as Newt Gingrich, one of the top-tier republican candidates has suggested. Again, something we have heard over and over again since the 2008 election, yet, little has been accomplished to get it done.

The security fence is not an inexpensive proposition, estimated to cost roughly $4 million a mile. If we were to build 1,900 miles of fence, the cost would be right around $8 billion. While that is a lot of money, it pales in comparison to the loss of life on the border due to the difficulty of the terrain, the heat and lack of life supporting resources along the border (estimates are as high as 2,000 a year), the potential for terrorists to cross, the jobs taken from citizens of the United States by the illegal border crossers, the gang and criminal influence which follows illegal immigration, etc. There is a seldom heard fact, that there are approximately 280,000 illegal crossings of our border by people who are not Mexicans. As a result, most Americans would agree that it is a small price to pay for the elimination of those problems. In fact, with few exceptions every one of the republican candidates for president since the 2008 election has claimed support for the fence. Yet, it remains incomplete. We need a President of the United States who will lead in the political process to get it done.

Click Here For More Information
Once the border is sealed and the leak stopped, the existing illegal population can be dealt with. As was discussed above, the number of illegal immigrants is very large indeed. Some of the best ideas for dealing with this part of the problem come from none other than republican party candidate, Newt Gingrich. As a candidate for President of the United States he has approached these and other issues head on and with great intellect. These problems require serious attention and bold leadership. It is this author's uncompensated and unsolicited opinion that Newt Gingrich has the answers to America's illegal immigration problem. You can check out Newt's illegal immigration solutions at http://www.newt.org/solutions.

Article Written by: Ralph T. Hudson

Former District Director for

U.S. Congressman Asa Hutchinson (R)

Arkansas 3rd District

I wish you success in your quest to live your life on your terms.

Your Comments Are Welcomed in the Comment Box Provided at the End of the Post

Other places to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing:


http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Emory-Affiliated-Marketing/105097862855281?v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503082793

http://affiliatehotspot.blogspot.com/

http://nutri-heal-affiliate.blogspot.com/

http://twitter.com/@ClickFinder

http://twitter.com/@MichaelDEmory

Monday, August 22, 2011

News & Posts From The Right For A Postive Change In 2012

Click for A Patriotic Song
Please Sign up as a Subcriber to my Email List in the form on the right of the page and Check Out all the links to follow and connect with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing at the end of the article.


All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.

John Adams





Click for Obama Link
Click for Link to Rick Perry
Some people seem to associate Perry with "globalists, bilderbergers, the Fed, etc.," but it seems kind of hard to be in league with them when you oppose the things certain people associate with them like the FED, the UN, open borders, amnesty, climate change COKE parties in Copenhagen, etc. Perry IS OPPOSED TO THE VERY PEOPLE BEHIND ALL THAT - THE BUSHIES pushing LUCIFERIAN RINO ROMNEY, COLLEGE REPUBLICAN RYAN and GAY AGENDA RINO CHRISTIE. SEEMS THE TEA PARTY MAN HAS ARRIVED. Just talk to Karl Rove and George Soros or Mitt Romney and they will tell you WHO IS THE ONE PERSON THREATENING THEIR PLANS TODAY.

GEORGE SOROS/DNC/BIG UNION has entered into an unholy alliance with the BUSHIES, ROMNEY and RON PAUL to disseminate dirt on Perry. It is interesting to see Giuliani people in the mix opposing them and supporting us. They could be useful in ridding us of Romney early. WE HAVE TO STOP LUCIFERIAN RINO ROMNEY IN NH AND PUSH BACK HIS MACHINE IN THE WEST.

HAS ANYONE ELSE BESIDES RICK PERRY THAT IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT CREATED ANY JOBS?! DOES ANYONE ELSE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT HAVE A RECORD OF ECONOMIC SUCCESS AND RESPECT FOR AMERICAN FAITH AND MORALS?! Has anyone else running for president put the middle class and small business first in restoring a strong and prosperous America?!

Not that Ron Paul HAS CREATED ANY JOBS OR HAS A RECORD OF ANY ACHIEVEMENT IN HIS THIRTY YEAR VACATION IN CONGRESS, not one piece of legislation in thirty years, but A WHOLE LOT OF BUSHIE BIG SPENDING EAR MARKS, AND his advocacy FOR OPEN BORDERS AND AMNESTY DEPRESSES AMERICAN WAGES AND PUTS AMERICANS OUT OF WORK SO THAT AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT UNDERCLASS CAN TAKE THEIR jobs. While railing against "globalists, neo cons, bilderbergers, etc.," he does their bidding with the BUSHIES AND THE RINOs in PUSHING AMNESTY AND OPEN BORDERS. RON PAUL's ECONOMIC POLICY IS TO RUN AGAINST AMERICAN JOBS AND AMERICAN WAGES. We hope he and his people figure out the error of their ways and turn back and START SUPPORTING THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS AND SMALL BUSINESS, the AMERICAN DREAM. WE HOPE HE AND HIS PEOPLE GET PAST THE TALKING POINTS AND HALF TRUTHES PROVIDED BY GEORGE SOROS AND THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN TO SEE THAT THERE IS A BETTER WAY than being used as pawns of the socialist enemy.

THE KEY TO EARLY VICTORY IS ERASING FRATRICIDAL STRIFE and allowing donors and infrastructure to settle in a prolonged exposition of the OBAMA SOCIALIST RECORD and choosing a frontrunner EARLY to keep up the pressure throughout 2012, acting as the "legitimate AMERICAN GOVERNMENT IN EXILE." BEATING ROMNEY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE AND SETTING UP EFFECTIVE WESTERN STATE INFRASTRUCTURES TO GET OUR VOTES OUT TO THE EARLIEST POLLS IS KEY. AN EARLY TICKET ALLOWING THE VP TO CAMPAIGN HARD IS INDISPENSIBLE.

RICK PERRY IS RIGHT ABOUT THE FED. ITS QE POLICIES AND WEIMAR SPENDING
Click for Information
HAVE CREATED AN OBAMA DOLLAR WORTH THE SAME AS THE FDR PENNY. THAT MEANS MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN SALARIES HAVE LOST THEIR VALUE, SMALL BUSINESSES THEIR NET WORTH, THE AMERICAN ECONOMY ITS WEALTH, ALL TRANSFERRED TO A SECRET FORTUNATE FEW WHO HAVE A CENTURY LONG CASH FLOW FROM THE FED OF ROBBING THE AMERICAN DREAM AND SADDLING AMERICA WITH GENERATIONAL DEBT, THEFT. I'm sure a certain "Reagan official" is nothing more than a KARL ROVE T-A-R-P BUSHIE who is cut in on some of the take. BUT ROBBING THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS AND SMALL BUSINESS CAN BE NOTHING BUT TREASONOUS! PERRY IS RIGHT! WE SHOULD BEGIN TO PUT PRESSURE ON THE FED. PERRY DIDN'T BACK AWAY FROM HIS STATEMENTS, BTW. (For the Ron Paul people-WHERE WAS YOUR GUY-seems Perry is the only person to speak out about the "bilderbergers" you try to link him to, huh?!).

Now there is Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Team Obama talking about the "fake Texas miracle" and how they are "low paying jobs" or "government jobs" in the OIL AND GAS industry (?!) and they can't make up their minds on whether or not they want to take credit for Texas job creation or bash it or just take the credit away from Perry. Here's some facts for people like the Washington Post. During Rick Perry's time in charge of Texas, HE HAS CREATED ONE MILLION JOBS, 300,000 since the recession began, AND TEXAS IS STILL CREATING JOBS. IN contrast, Barack HUSEIN Obama has LOST A NET 2,500,000 jobs and shrunk the economy to the same size it was in George W BUSH 2007. On George W Bush's last day in office, unemployment was 7.5%, where George W Bush's "retrograde" economic policies averaged 6% unemployment over 8 years. Obama is at a HIGHLY adjusted 9.1% unemployment, has averaged 9.25% unemployment during his socialist reign of terror and his people talk of him being the "only president to have a record of NEGATIVE JOB CREATION." NEARLY 2,000,000 people HAVE CEASED LOOKING FOR WORK AND LEFT THE JOB POOL, which, if including increases in population, MAKE OBAMA UNEMPLOYMENT OVER 13% IF WE WERE USING THE STANDARDS APPLIED SINCE CLINTON AND ENDING WITH W. When OBAMA was elected in November 2008, Bush's unemployment was at 6% and STEADILY INCREASED as businesses learned more and more of what Obama's socialist assault on them would look like. Obama has tried to take credit for the JOBS PERRY HAS CREATED so citing that "most jobs are govt. jobs" IS JUST A LEFTIST SMEAR which has morphed from earlier in the week THE WASHINGTON POST stating that most of the jobs were "low paying minimum wage jobs" differing from last weeks Washington Post statement that most of the jobs were in the "oil and gas industry" to the previous weeks' Washington Post's disingenuous "Obama's record of job creation (sic!)." WHICH IS IT, WASHINGTON POST?! Make up your mind. Why can't Michigan or California or Nevada CREATE GOVT. JOBS OR EVEN THE JOBS YOU DISMISS AS "LOW PAYING MINIMUM WAGE" jobs?! How is it Texas is able TO STILL CREATE absorbing economic migrants from northern, socialist states while those socialist states, like MA and NY, can only stay afloat by shedding people?! Lastly, WHY DOESN'T OBAMA HAVE EVEN NET GOVT.
Click for Obama Link
JOBS and has to rely on the RIDICULOUS AND ECONOMICALLY ILLITERATE RHETORIC of creating jobs by unemployment checks, foodstamps and welfare?! HOW IS IT LBJ's GREATSOCIETY OR FDR's NEW DEAL NEVER SPURRED ON JOB BOOMS WASHINGTON POST, but, instead created MASSIVE UNEMPLOYMENT, soup kitchens, welfare cheese family banquets? If a welfare check puts people to work, why doesn't it put the person getting it back to work so that he can BE A CONTRIBUTING MEMBER OF SOCIETY, pay taxes, and stop draining the treasury?! RICK PERRY's jobs, however you wish to malign them, HAVE DONE THAT. Whereas, Obama's socialism HAS LED TO THE FIRST US DEBT DOWNGRADE IN HISTORY (WHERE S & P STATED HAD "CUT, CAP, AND BALANCE" passed, they WOULD NOT HAVE DOWNGRADED--That was the Tea Party "terrorist" bill Obama and the socialists are running against today with your help, Washington Post). OBAMA's dollar is today worth the same as FDR's penny, meaning a NATIONAL GENERATIONAL WEALTH TRANSFER OF AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS SALARIES AND SMALL BUSINESS NET WORTH TO SECRET ELITES THE FED HAS ROBBED AMERICA WITH FOR 100 YEARS. Is that not treason, Washington Post, WHERE TODAY Obama's socialist debt is equal to 100% of GDP and a certain unnamed few with the Red Chinese are the people who own the mortgage to America's future. HOW DARE YOU, WASHINGTON POST, SMEAR ANYONE's ECONOMIC RECORD, when you refuse to ACCURATELY REPORT OBAMA DUE TO THE COLOUR OF HIS SKIN?! THAT IS NOT ONLY LIBELOUS, POLITICAL AGITPROP for the DNC, THAT IS PATENT WHITE PATERNALIST RACISM in a cleaned up northeastern iteration of northeastern klanmanship manipulation.

LONG LIVE THE AMERICAN DREAM!  - 


REMEMBER NOVEMBER! THE REAGAN REVOLUTION

+GOD SAVE THE REPUBLIC! +GOD BLESS AMERICA!



I wish you success in your quest to live your life on your terms.

Your Comments Are Welcomed in the Comment Box Provided at the End of the Post

Other places to follow and connect with
Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Emory-Affiliated-Marketing/105097862855281?v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503082793

http://affiliatehotspot.blogspot.com/

http://nutri-heal-affiliate.blogspot.com/

http://twitter.com/@ClickFinder
http://twitter.com/@MichaelDEmory

http://www.emorykeywest.getdeals.us

emorykewest@charter.net



Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Maybe There Is Hope



News & Posts From The Right For A Postive Change In 2012
Please fill out the Subscribe to Email List and
Check Out all the links to follow and connect
with Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing at the end of the article.


Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Don't judge each day by the harvest you reap but by the seeds that you plant.
Robert Louis Stevenson
 
 
 
A Great Conversation On Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536
l
Michael Emory 20 million illegal mexicans just waiting to vote for senior bama and become the new welfare slaves voting block. Sign up as a poll worker and help put a stop to illegal voting.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=234985923203783&set=a.201095016592874.43190.100000771325536&type=1&ref=nfhttp://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=234985923203783&set=a.201095016592874.43190.100000771325536&type=1&ref=nf
Wall Photos

                       Click On This Picture For Unsettling Video On B. Hussein O'roadside-boma
Top of Form
                                                       15 hours ago · Like · · Share
Ric Schulte, Jim McGuire, Anthony John James Mathison and 7 others like this.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000802472754 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000802472754
l
Stacie Lynn I have a dumb question for you Michael- where do I sign up to work at a polling place??
I think that would be awesome.

15 hours ago · Like
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000341430286 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000341430286
l
Tracy Porshia and then we will have more rioters than London.
14 hours ago · Unlike · 1 person
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1614212193 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1614212193
l
Joan Elzey This is exactly how he will be re-elected. A lot of voting will be race based also. Remember he did not win the popular vote last time.
7 hours ago · Like
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000622874163 http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000622874163
l
Pam Morin i am going to be a poll worker for my county they are not getting past me....go home or come in legally....
3 hours ago · Like
http://www.facebook.com/ajmathison http://www.facebook.com/ajmathison
l
Anthony John James Mathison Not only that! Let's educate our Mexican-Americans to cherish their Catholic and Hispanic heritage which is, culturally and religiously, AGAINST just about everything Obama stands for.

Any Hispanic (illegal or not) who lives on welfare without a good reason is an AFFRONT to all that La Hispanidad represents. We are a self-sufficient people who changed the world. Obama is trying to enslave us because he (unwittingly perhaps) holds that liberal predjudice against the common man (which so many Hispanics in the US represent).

He is trying to turn all of us Hispanics into SLAVES to the government.

It is no wonder that the Hispanic Republicans are growing in numbers everyday! Hispanic culture is FAR more in keeping with the vision of the Founding Fathers (especially Carroll) than any crap Obama preaches.

Muerte a Obama!


Click On This Picture For Link To Rick Perry
3 hours ago · Unlike ·
1 person
http://www.facebook.com/ajmathison http://www.facebook.com/ajmathison
l
Anthony John James Mathison In Costa Rica, where my mother was born, you can't get government assistance period unless you are a legal citizen AND you have a job. It is considered a dishonor in our culture as Hispanics to seek government help unless there is a serious reason to do so. If we need help, we go first to our FAMILIES and the CHURCH.

Obama would have us abandon our families and Holy Mother Church and become HIS slaves (and the slaves of his wicked ideology).

I for one will not have it, and I educate as many Hispanic about Obama's prejudice as I can.

Sorry, but as a Hispanic I felt I needed to speak up. :)

3 hours ago · Unlike · 3 people

Click On This Picture For A Link To Newt Gingrich
http://www.facebook.com/ajmathison http://www.facebook.com/ajmathison
l
Anthony John James Mathison Oh, and btw, by "Mexican-American" I mean LEGAL immigrants.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1 person
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536
Michael Emory @Anthony John James Mathison - I am so proud of you for being able to see and understand what the "dimocrats" are trying to do to the Hispanic families. Within just a few years of life as a "dimocratic" welfare slaves the family and social structure of the Hispanic community will be destroyed just like they did with the blacks. What you end up with is a whole group of people with no responsibility for themselves, that are so busy standing in line for a hand-out that they don't have time at first and later just don't give a damm about getting out and being part of a productive society. That pathetic mess should never be allowed to be repeated.

GOD Bless America

I wish you success in your quest to live your life on your terms.

Your Comments Are Welcomed in the Comment Box Provided at the End of the Post

Other places to follow and connect with
Mike Emory Affiliated Marketing:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mike-Emory-Affiliated-Marketing/105097862855281?v=wall

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000771325536

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001503082793

http://affiliatehotspot.blogspot.com/

http://nutri-heal-affiliate.blogspot.com/

http://twitter.com/@ClickFinder http://twitter.com/@MichaelDEmory

http://www.emorykeywest.getdeals.us


emorykewest@charter.net